radicallyaligned:

lez-exclude-men:

Honestly, I wouldn’t mind the gender nonsense so much if we went back to “sex and gender are distinct things and yes I’m female but I identify as a man” bc then at least it wouldn’t be so dangerous to women. I’d still roll my eyes at nonbinary peeps and “starself” but at the end of the day it probably wouldn’t affect people outside of their social circle. Trying to abolish sex-based identifiers on a legal level and saying “sex is a social construct/it doesn’t exist” HURTS PEOPLE. ESPECIALLY WOMEN. We have spent so much time fighting for protections from sex-based oppression, yet in one fell swoop genderists are trying to destroy all of that work by erasing the concept of sex on both the social and legal levels. It’s ridiculous.

Sex and gender are different. I don’t care what you do with your gender, but sex-based protections for women were hard fought for. Voting, job rights, housing rights, banking rights, public spaces (restrooms, locker rooms, etc), medical rights, bodily autonomy(periods, birth control, abortion).

These sex- based securities are essential for women, and denying the biological realities of sex doesn’t only hurt women, but transmen as well!! You cannot call yourself trans-inclusive if you cut transmen off from access to sex- based securities.

spookyterf:

mysharona1987:

It reminds me of the argument people have made about The Handmaid’s Tale when they say the handmaids aren’t *really* being raped because they technically had a choice.

Yes, if I had a choice between being raped once a month or being sent off to die slowly and horribly of starvation and/or radiation sickness, I’d pick the former. Most women would.

Doesn’t mean I’m still not being raped though. Because I wasn’t given any real choice.  

This just in: it’s not rape if he holds a knife to your throat and you choose sex over death!

Source: mysharona1987

guys holy fuck

discourser-of-kruphix:

hentairobot:

sindri42:

sindri42:

sindri42:

sindri42:

sindri42:

sindri42:

sindri42:

sindri42:

sindri42:

So we just got back from toysrus and guess what we found?

This is the stupidest thing and I love it so much.

I call it the wristfucker.

Jedi Feferi cosplay in progress.

THIS IS STUPID

Wristfucker 2.0: fuck your whole family’s wrists.

Pros: impenetrable defense leaves no way for your opponent to cut off your hand.

Cons: you have already cut off your whole arm and maybe impaled yourself.

My finest creation.

IS THAT LAST ONE WHAT I THINK IT IS

fundmyescape:

swedepea:

embrace-the-matriarchy:

ladydispute:

Girlhood is realizing grown men think of you sexually at 12

My father was gracious enough to give me till age 14. Female privilege, amirite?

I was only in class 4 when I was sexualized for the first time (that I’m aware of) and I was only 10 years old. That was the average among my peers which is so terrible to think about now… Girls don’t get a proper childhood and it’s a fucking abomination. Fuck this patriarchal bullshit.

I had an early puberty from being molested so badly by my dad at 9 years old

the-exercist:

Eating under your recommended daily calories isn’t dangerous because it may cause you to gain weight in the future.

Eating under your recommended daily calories is dangerous because it can permanently damage your bones, liver, gallbladder, brain, heart, sleep cycle, mental health, etc. The effects are severe and far reaching!

So let’s please stop painting weight gain as the ultimate negative impact. Yes, it can happen, but it’s not the utmost worst case scenario. Fear-mongering about weight gain doesn’t help to teach people that it’s okay to eat more.