the thing about tumblr that i think i’ll miss the most if it goes down is the like…quiet companionship on this site. i’m not talking about like knowing there are other people here who have the same views you do, or who don’t judge you for being honest and expressing yourself, though those are all good. i mean like…the mutuals you’ve had for years who you don’t talk to but you know. you might not know them well but it makes you happy when they post a cute selfie, or talk about something good that happened at their job. familiar names. little friendships. little connections in the vast sea of the internet, where you have to choose between total anonymity or sharing everything. we built communities in this hellscape and i don’t want to say goodbye to my neighbors just yet.
seeing a disturbing number of people promoting the idea that incels and red-pillers should go see sex workers or “just get an escort” and similar things…might i remind everyone that sex workers are not lesser beings we can just foist society’s problems off on, and that they are definitely not on the hook to absolve an entire culture of its legacy of violent misogyny. we should absolutely not be flippantly suggesting that these often-violent misogynists and woman-haters spend more time alone with women who don’t have the legal or institutional means to defend themselves, and who are already facing increased risks of sexual violence and physical abuse from their regular clientele.
hot take: incels, red-pillers, often violent-misogynists and woman-haters are the regular clientele of ‘sex workers’.
men who don’t hate women do not have sex with women who don’t wanna have sex with them.
“Incels are such a problem lets make sure there’s a group a women set aside for them to purchase and abuse just like they want to.”
Only radfems could suck each others clits off about a disenfranchised group of men and women and have no idea what they’re talking about. Case in point:
This what they think incels are
And this is what they think escorts are:
Congratulations you’ve managed to out-stupify yourselves.
These two sentences are about how misogynists are the primary clientele that maintain the prostitution of women. You know a prostitute only having sex with a man for money doesn’t mean she actually wants to have sex with him right?
I am curious to know which group you’re saying is disenfranchised here.
The radfem qualifications on what makes a man a misogynist might as well be, “If he has a Y chromosome, …” , so I’m not even gonna entertain you on that front.
I know prostitutes are more likely to be trafficked victims or desperate women coming from below the poverty line, but escorts are different. They’re normally already well off, and they are naturally promiscuous who don’t mind having sex with any man. These women do exist, and some do it for free, and others for money, or even both. Not to mention escorts are their own bosses, no pimp or john in the picture. Their only boss is the IRS.
Your idea that all escorts are “naturally promiscuous” and that none of them are victims of sex trafficking is frankly preposterous. You sound like you’re saying “well prostitution is bad, but I can rationalize THIS prostitution to be fine”. I mean men espouse what they believe to be the motivations of women all the time and they’re typically wrong.
And really, someone says “misogynists are the clientele of prostituted women” and you get “well just having a Y chromosome must make a man a misogynist!”
Like.. is the implication here that all men use or would use trafficked and prostituted women and therefore all would have to be considered a misogynist?
“All men”
Yea you would think that
Funny, I was gonna say the exact same thing about radfems talking about men!
Anyway, to recap. You don’t know what an incel’s psyche is like, because they’re not your typical type of misogynist.
And you don’t know anything about escorts, or any other types of sex workers for that matter, because you automatically label them all as trafficked victims.
Um, dude? You’re the one who implied it. That’s why I was asking.
You don’t know what an incel’s psyche is like, because they’re not your typical type of misogynist.
The proudly demonstrate it all over the internet. And so what? Misogyny is misogyny.
And you don’t know anything about escorts, or any other types of sex workers for that matter, because you automatically label them all as trafficked victims.
They all have the potential to be and yet you think you somehow know the difference. “Sex work” creates demand that traffickers fulfill. It’s all interwoven.
“They all have the potential to be”, what kind of half assed rebuttal is that? No one is “potentially” a victim of human trafficking. They are, or they aren’t. Most prostitutes that work for a pimp are. All escorts are not. Being an escort is a job you choose to get into yourself. You work for yourself, you don’t need to split shares with anyone. Just pay your taxes.
Sex work can exist without human trafficking
Human trafficking can exist without sex work (forced labor, black market for organs, etc)
So they’re not as “interwoven” as you think.
Incels, as fucked as they are, DETEST sex workers, and wouldn’t dare pay them for their services, or have anything to do with them (besides maybe jerk off to porn), because they don’t want to give anyone the satisfaction that they’re so undesirable, they have to pay to get laid. If you can’t get pussy for free, youre an incel. Contrapoints explains their psyche way better than I can.
They all have the potential to be”, what kind of half assed rebuttal is that? No one is “potentially” a victim of human trafficking. They are, or they aren’t. Most prostitutes that work for a pimp are. All escorts are not.
“Sex work” and human trafficking are interwoven. There will never be a shortage of men kidnapping girls and women to sell as products as long as there are men who create a demand for prostituted women.
If you can’t get pussy for free, youre an incel.
Framing a woman actually desiring to have sex with you as “pussy for free” tells me a lot about your attitude toward women.
Título del sitio 